purity and danger造句

• Anthropologist Mary Douglas wrote in her book " Purity and Danger " that the biblical cleanliness passages merely represent cultural concepts of symbolic boundary integrity.
• His " Taboo " had a decisive impact on Mary Douglas, and her recent biographer calls it'the crucial point of departure'for her early study " Purity and Danger " ( 1966 ).
• Building on the thinking of Mary Douglas outlined in her " Purity and Danger " ( 1966 ), Butler claims that the boundaries of the body have been drawn to instate certain taboos about limits and possibilities of exchange.
• Mary Douglas's classic " Purity and Danger " on pollutions and uncertainty  what we often denote as'risk' was fundamentally influenced by Evans-Pritchard's views on how accusations, blame and responsibility are deployed though culturally specific conceptions of misfortune and harm.
• British anthropologist Mary Douglas, in her 1966 book " Purity and Danger : An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, " explains the prohibition as a problem of taxonomy : The pig did not fit conveniently into the Israelites'definitions of what a domestic animal should be ( the cloven hooves, the failure to chew their cuds like cows ).
• Later in a 2002 preface to " Purity and Danger ", Douglas went on to retract this explanation of the kosher rules, saying that it had been " a major mistake . " Instead, she proposed that " the dietary laws intricately model the body and the altar upon one another . " For instance, among land animals, Israelites were only allowed to eat animals that were also allowed to be sacrificed : animals that depend on herdsmen.